The idea is not to grade students on assignments, concerts, or projects but instead by to assess whether they have reached, exceeded, or have failed to reach outcomes. Genius!! Whoever thought of this deserves a gold star! Not only does this provide teachers with a method to justify their marks but it also moves away from teachers handing out percentage based marks that could have easily been 5% either way of the given mark. With this idea you can look through all of the different outcomes and say that this student is either meeting or not meeting these outcomes quite definitively (some people may include exceeding and other stages too). If our jobs are to teach the curriculum then we would probably assume that it is the job of a student to learn the curriculum. If this is the case (and some people may say that it is not) then why would we not assess and grade based on the curriculum? To me it seems obvious. However, maybe I'm missing something.
The whole point of me bringing this method of assessment up is that I had been functioning under a bias that I did not know that I had. I was working with a bias that had me believing that assignments were just a thing that we teachers hand out in order to give our students marks and that these assignments were out of a certain amount marks simply based on how much work that was needed to be done to complete them well. I had been functioning under this bias because, as far as I could tell, many teachers that I had functioned under the same one and used marks simply as a tool to assign us grades so that they could keep their jobs- I hope that this was not the case.
After reflecting on realizing my bias towards evaluation I did come to the conclusion that there are so many things that we teachers do for reasons that I don't really understand. Meaning that I must always be thinking critically and challenging what I do believe and why I believe it. Sometimes we think that we have the whole picture figured out but it always seems to turn out that we really don't. We may have a photograph that looks good from far away but is missing pixels when you look up close. Or you may have a picture of something that is put together quite well but then you realize that it is all part of a larger puzzle and that some pieces just aren't making sense. This evaluation method was not only an awesome skill to learn but it was also a good reminder that we never really know everything about anything- even if we are trying to learn about ourselves.
Lesson for the week: There are many great ideas that are waiting for us to simply challenge our own thinking and functions in order to find them.